USPTO serial 76577683
TIAN YEE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TIAN YEE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie K. Mitchell
Leslie K. Mitchell ARENT FOX PLLC1675 BroadwayNew York, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Rice, pasta; tea, coffee, cocoa; coffee essences, coffee extracts, mixtures of coffee and chicory, chicory and chicory mixtures, all for use as substitutes for coffee; non-medicated confectionery, namely, chocolate; pastries, cakes, biscuits, ices, namely, edible fruit ices, flavored ices, frozen yoghurt being confectionery ices, and fruit ices; ice cream, ice cream products, namely, ice cream, ice cream drinks, ice cream mixes, ice cream substitute, ice-cream cakes and soy-based ice cream substitute; frozen confections; chilled desserts, namely, bakery desserts, dessert mousse, dessert puddings; dessert souffles, and flavored, sweetened gelatin desserts; mousses, sorbets; bread; pastry; sweet spreads, namely, cocoa spreads, and spreads containing chocolate and nuts; sweet pies, snack foods, namely, cereal based snack food, granola-based snack bars, puffed corn snacks, rice-based snack foods and wheat-based snack foods; prepared meals, namely, frozen, prepared or packaged entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice, frozen, prepared or packaged meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice, prepared pizza, prepared cocoa and cocoa-based beverages, and prepared coffee and coffee-based beverages; chocolate, chocolates, chocolate products, namely, chocolate, chocolate bars, chocolate candies, chocolate chips, chocolate covered nuts, chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable-based, chocolate mousse, chocolate pastes, chocolate powder, chocolate syrup, chocolate topping, chocolate-based ready-to-eat food bars, filled chocolate, hot chocolate, milk chocolate, spread containing chocolate; sauces including toppings for ice cream and desserts, namely, chocolate topping and topping syrup; pizzas, pizza bases, namely, pizza crust, pizza dough and pizza sauce; sauces and toppings for pizzas, namely, cheese sauce, tomato sauce, and ready-made sauces; sauces for pasta and rice; salad dressings; mayonnaise; confectionery in liquid form, namely, liquid candy; aromatic preparations for food, namely, flavoring additives for non-nutritional purposes, and food additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring, ingredient or filler; herbal sugar candy, spices; infusions, namely, herbal infusions and tea for infusions; seasonings; essences for use as flavorings for foodstuffs, not being essential oils, namely, herbal essences and non-alcoholic essences for use in food preparation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 1, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |