Drawing for HELIUM PARIS

USPTO serial 76577725

HELIUM PARIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADEMACHER, MARK A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HELIUM PARIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barbara Svoronos

BARBARA SVORONOS SILVERMAN PERLSTEIN & ACAMPORA LLP100 JERICHO QUADRANGLE, STE 300JERICHO, NY 11753UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009spectacles, spectacle frames, spectacle cases, glasses and sunglassesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 15, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 14, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 30, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 30, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 11, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 10, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 2, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance