USPTO serial 76577927
CK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
C.K. HAIR INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Fanling, New Territories, HK
C.K. HAIR INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Fanling, New Territories, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Phillip G. Avruch
PHILLIP G AVRUCH RABIN & BERDO PC1101 14TH ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | Hair wigs and nets | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 4, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 4, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |