CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for TUG

USPTO serial 76577940

TUG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TUG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maurice U. Cahn

MAURICE U CAHN CAHN & SAMUELS LLP2000 P ST NW STE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20036-6924UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK ENABLING AND GATEWAY EQUIPMENT FOR PROVISIONING, CONFIGURATION, AUTHENTICATION, AUTHORIZATION, ACCOUNTING "AAA", BILLING, AND NETWORK MONITORING, NAMELY, CUSTOMER PREMISE CIRCUITRY, RF CONNECTORS, POWER SUPPLIES, RADIOS, AMPLIFIERS, AND TUNNELING MULTIPOINT DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF RF TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS, CONNECTORS, POWER SUPPLIES, RADIOS, AMPLIFIERS, AND ANTENNAS.ACTIVE—
038Wireless electronic transmission of voice signals, data, images and informationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 12, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 27, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 13, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 20, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 9, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 28, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 28, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance