USPTO serial 76578075
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Redwood City, CA
Redwood City, CA
MENLO PARK, CA
ISCIENCE INTERVENTIONAL CORPORATION
MENLO PARK, CA
Other trademarks owned by ISCIENCE INTERVENTIONAL CORPORATION
ISCIENCE INTERVENTIONAL CORPORATION
MENLO PARK, CA
Other trademarks owned by ISCIENCE INTERVENTIONAL CORPORATION
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael L. Louie
STEVE D BEYER Weaver Austin Villeneuve & Sampson LLPP.O. Box 70250Oakland, CA 94612-0250UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Accoustical and electromagnetic medical diagnostic imaging apparatus and components thereof for use in ophthalmic diagnosis and related medical procedures; surgical instruments for use in ophthalmic surgery; and ophthalmic implants, namely, stents and suture clips | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 9, 2006 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |