USPTO serial 76578212
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Sherman Oaks, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Schaap
ROBERT J SCHAAP LAW OFFICES ROBERT J SCHAAP21241 VENTURA BLVD STE 188WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91364-2109UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | ALCOHOLIC BEER, NON-ALCOHOLIC BEER AND ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |