USPTO serial 76578221
PLAYERZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLAYERZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Guy D. Yale
GUY D. YALE ALIX, YALE & RISTAS, LLP750 MAIN STREETSUITE 600HARTFORD, CT 06103-2721Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | DIE CAST TOY VEHICLES; TOY VEHICLES; RADIO CONTROLLED TOY VEHICLES; ELECTRONICALLY OPERATED TOY MOTOR VEHICLES; PLASTIC MODEL KITS, NAMELY TOY MODEL HOBBY CRAFT KITS AND TOY SCALE MODEL VEHICLES; TOY MODEL TRAIN SETS; SCALE MODEL CARS, SCALE MODEL MOTORCYCLES, SCALE MODEL AIR-CRAFTS; TOY SCALE SIZE COLLECTOR MODEL VEHICLES AND MINIATURE TOY MODEL VEHICLES; TOY VEHICLES IN THE NATURE OF AIRPLANES, BOATS, MOTORCYCLES, TRUCKS AND CONSTRUCTION CARS; ELECTRIC CHRISTMAS ACTION TOYS; TRANSFORMING ROBOTIC TOYS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |