USPTO serial 76578243
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Sussman Sikes & Associates, Inc.
Southfield, MI
Sussman Sikes & Associates, Inc.
Southfield, MI
ALAN J. SUSSMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SOUTHFIELD, MI
Other trademarks owned by ALAN J. SUSSMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Suzanne D. Nolan
SUZANNE D NOLAN FRANK, HARON, WEINER & NAVARRO5435 CORPORATE DR STE 225TROY, MI 48098UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Magazines featuring interviews with local figures about issues and events in a particular business or profession | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Radio entertainment services, namely, an on-going radio program featuring interviews with local figures about issues and events in a particular business or profession; providing an on-going television program featuring interviews with local figures about issues and events in a particular business or profession; providing an online, non-downloadable newsletter featuring interviews with local figures about issues and events in a particular business or profession, that also includes links to allow users to view clips of such interviews | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |