Drawing for WHO CHICAGO

USPTO serial 76578243

WHO CHICAGO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHO CHICAGO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Suzanne D. Nolan

SUZANNE D NOLAN FRANK, HARON, WEINER & NAVARRO5435 CORPORATE DR STE 225TROY, MI 48098UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Magazines featuring interviews with local figures about issues and events in a particular business or professionACTIVE—
041Radio entertainment services, namely, an on-going radio program featuring interviews with local figures about issues and events in a particular business or profession; providing an on-going television program featuring interviews with local figures about issues and events in a particular business or profession; providing an online, non-downloadable newsletter featuring interviews with local figures about issues and events in a particular business or profession, that also includes links to allow users to view clips of such interviewsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 3, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 3, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 3, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 3, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 3, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 16, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 2, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 2, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 2, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 4, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 12, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 22, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 5, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 18, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 18, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 20, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 17, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 15, 2004CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 14, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance