USPTO serial 76578324
SMART CRISPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 4, 2006
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMART CRISPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sea Cliff, NY
Sea Cliff, NY
Sea Cliff, NY
SEA CLIFF, NY
ROBERT'S AMERICAN GOURMET FOOD, LLC
SEA CLIFF, NY
Other trademarks owned by ROBERT'S AMERICAN GOURMET FOOD, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Margarita Wallach
Margarita Wallach McCarter & English, LLP245 Park Avenue, 27th FloorNew York, NY 10167UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Soy based snack food | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 11, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROBERT'S AMERICAN GOURMET
- Other trademarks owned by ROBERT'S AMERICAN GOURMET
- Other trademarks owned by ROBERT'S AMERICAN GOURMET
- Other trademarks owned by RAGF, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ROBERT'S AMERICAN GOURMET FOOD, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named SMART CRISPS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 24, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 18, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |