USPTO serial 76578482
CENTRE MONDIAL DU PLURALISME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 6, 2009
- Examiner
- KEAN, AMY C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with CENTRE MONDIAL DU PLURALISME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Kelly
David M. Kelly KELLY IP, LLP1300 19th Street, NWSuite 420Washington, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | association services, namely, promoting the interests of a pluralist society worldwide, namely, to foster pluralist societies worldwide in order to accelerate and widen the benefits of development and promote human security, propagate and grow pluralism as a value and promote pluralistic practices among individuals, organizations, communities, societies and states, deepen global understanding and appreciation of the benefits that accrue from respect for human differences, including but not limited to differences of faith, religious belief, ethnicity, language, history, perspective, and thought, promote pluralism as an ethical, intellectual and institutional pillar of good governance, social justice, economic opportunity, unfettered cultural expression, arid religious freedom, encourage and strengthen the capacity of all elements of society to work collaboratively to mediate social harmony, promote diversity, manage differences, and guarantee equality, support the efforts of societies to harness constitutional, judicial, institutional and other instruments or mechanisms to promote and protect the practice of pluralism, develop constituencies of advocates for pluralism in Canada and other countries who work together in an organized way either as individuals or through chapters and networks or organizations to promote the above; [ providing lobbying information and advice that promote the interest of professional representation in the field of pluralism; conferral supervision, namely, business supervision of individuals and groups that wish to promote or create new branch entities for purposes of promoting and fostering pluralism; ] public policy research in the field of pluralism directed at providing access to information about the benefits of pluralism and to foster pluralistic societies | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | [ Financial sponsorship of organizations that promote pluralism; charitable fundraising; tuition services, namely, providing educational scholarships ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | [ library services; ] educational services, namely, providing instruction, training, courses of instruction at the university and secondary levels, seminars, exhibitions, conferences and workshops all of the proceeding items in the field of pluralism that share the good practices of state and non-state actors in pluralist societies such as in Canada and elsewhere that other societies can use to become more pluralistic and provide information about the benefits of pluralism and how to foster pluralist societies; [ publishing of books for others, in printed form or electronically, in the field of pluralism; dissemination of educational materials of others in the field of pluralism; ] providing recognition and incentives by the way of awards for individuals, communities, organizations, societies and states who have made major contributions in the field of pluralism; [ educational and entertainment services, namely, providing motivational and educational speakers; organizing community cultural events to promote pluralism; ] educational research in the field of pluralism directed at providing access to information about the benefits of pluralism and to foster pluralistic societies | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | [ validation of educational and vocations qualifications, namely, accreditation services, namely, the development, evaluation and testing of educational standards for degrees, diplomas and certificates for the purpose of accreditation that these degrees conform to the specifications required to promote pluralism ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GLOBAL CENTRE FOR PLURALISM
- Other trademarks owned by Aga Khan Foundation Canada
- Other trademarks owned by Aga Khan Foundation Canada
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CENTRE MONDIAL DU PLURALISME
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 8, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 4, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |