USPTO serial 76578505
CLIPCARD TECHNOLOGY FOR CITIZENS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLIPCARD TECHNOLOGY FOR CITIZENS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
06800 Cagnes sur Mer, FR
06800 Cagnes sur Mer, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James C. Lydon
JAMES C LYDON JAMES C LYDON, ATTORNEY AT LAW100 DAINGERFIELD RD STE 100ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Blank tapes for tape-recorders, blank video-tapes for video-recorders, blank computer diskettes, blank computer hard discs, blank optical discs, blank electronic cards for processing images and blank magnetic encoded cards, blank magnetic bands; and cassette tapes for tape-recorders, video-tapes for video-recorders, computer diskettes, computer hard discs, optical discs, electronic cards for processing images and magnetic encoded cards and magnetic bands, all recorded in issuance and payment of offence tickets or breach of law penalties, namely for traffic violations for all types of vehicles; apparatus for the recording, the transmission and the reproduction of data, sound and image, namely portable telecommunication transmitters, tape recorders and mobile data receivers for issuing offence tickets comprising means to record data vocally, transmitters, receivers, and means to reproduce and re-record said data in a separate device, apparatus for transiting and reproducing sound or images, namely devices for reproducing data from portable devices for issuing offence tickets comprised of data reading devices, voice recognition software, display screens, printers, and electronic payment terminals; calculators, automatic electrical distribution boxes, namely parking meters capable of accepting coins or smart cards for paying offence tickets or breach of law penalties or traffic violations and parking violations; data processors, namely portable and non-portable computers, micro-computers, micro-processors, pocket computers namely personal digital pads, modems, smart card players, magnetic and electronic card players; blank smart cards | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business management services; computerized and central file management and business file management comprised of the recording of written and oral communications, and the compilation of mathematical or statistical data for issuing and payment of offence tickets or breach of law penalties, namely for traffic violations and parking violations and corresponding documentation | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation and maintenance of electronics | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications access services by means of telephone, cellular telephone, electronic mail, radiofrequency network, wireless fidelity network, satellite network and optical network; electronic messaging systems, namely electronic queuing services, electronic store-and-forward messaging; electronic voice messaging, namely the recording and subsequent transmission of voice message by telephone; electronic data transmission and communications between computer terminals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer consultation and design of computers for others, computer programming for others, computer software design for others and computer software development, installation of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GRISON, Paul
- Other trademarks owned by GRISON, Paul
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CLIPCARD TECHNOLOGY FOR CITIZENS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |