Drawing for COMMANDCENTER

USPTO serial 76578603

COMMANDCENTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMMANDCENTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David L. Principe

DAVID L PRINCIPE HODGSON RUSS LLPM&T PLZ STE 2000BUFFALO, NY 14203-2391UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Devices for the monitoring of equipment in the nature of electronic industrial controls for humidifiers, heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment and systems, and swimming pools equipment in the nature of dehumidifiers, heaters, air conditioners and pumps sold in combinationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 5, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 5, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2006RECGACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED—
Jan 11, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 26, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 26, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 23, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 11, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 22, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance