USPTO serial 76578603
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. Principe
DAVID L PRINCIPE HODGSON RUSS LLPM&T PLZ STE 2000BUFFALO, NY 14203-2391UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Devices for the monitoring of equipment in the nature of electronic industrial controls for humidifiers, heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment and systems, and swimming pools equipment in the nature of dehumidifiers, heaters, air conditioners and pumps sold in combination | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2006 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 26, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |