CopyMark Law Group
4.9
Drawing for COLORCONCEPTS

USPTO serial 76579154

COLORCONCEPTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BECK, LORETTA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLORCONCEPTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics namely, lipsticks, eye shadow, mascara, eyeliner, concealers, lip gloss, cosmetic pencils, nail colors, and makeup kits composed of makeup, lipstick, eye shadow and foundationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 12, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2006PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Dec 6, 2006PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Dec 6, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Nov 2, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 23, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 10, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 2, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 18, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 24, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 23, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 16, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 14, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 16, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 22, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance