USPTO serial 76579313
OPTIACAI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAN, AMY C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPTIACAI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | NUTRITIONALLY FORTIFIED BEVERAGES; MEAL REPLACEMENT AND DIETARY SUPPLEMENT DRINK MIXES; MEAL REPLACEMENT AND DIETARY SUPPLEMENT FOOD MIXES; MEAL REPLACEMENT DRINKS; MEAL REPLACEMENT BARS | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | HERBAL FOOD BEVERAGES; TEA-BASED BEVERAGES | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | RETAIL AND ON-LINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING HEALTH AND NUTRITION PRODUCTS, NAMELY, WEIGHT LOSS SUPPLEMENTS, HERBAL SUPPLEMENTS, DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS, NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS, FOOD ADDITIVES, HERBAL BEVERAGES, MEAL REPLACEMENT FOOD AND DRINK MIXES, MEAL REPLACEMENT FOODS AND BEVERAGES, AND MEDICAL FOODS; COMPUTERIZED ON-LINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF HEALTH AND NUTRITION; DIRECT RESPONSE RETAIL SERVICES BY MEANS OF INFOMERCIALS IN THE FIELD OF HEALTH AND NUTRITION; RETAIL SERVICES BY DIRECT SOLICITATION BY SALES AGENTS IN THE FIELD OF HEALTH AND NUTRITION; MULTI-LEVEL MARKETING BUSINESS SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF HEALTH AND NUTRITION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by k2a, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by k2a, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named OPTIACAI
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 15, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 25, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |