USPTO serial 76579837
JUSTROPES.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3108258Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 20, 2006
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with JUSTROPES.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DURHAM, NH
DURHAM, NH
Rowley, MA
BOSTON, MA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | On-line retail store featuring climbing equipment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JUSTROPES.COM, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by JUSTROPES.COM, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Cullem, James G.
- Other trademarks owned by ROCKWELLBARTLET GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named JUSTROPES.COM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |