Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 76580204?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/76580204. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns CHICK VISION?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 76580204, the listed owner(s) include: Roth, Eli.

What is USPTO serial number 76580204?

Serial number 76580204 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark CHICK VISION. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover CHICK VISION?

The public record lists International Classes: 009. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

USPTO serial 76580204

CHICK VISION

Q: What is the current status of CHICK VISION?

CHICK VISION (76580204) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Mar 10, 2004
Status date: Jan 23, 2008
Registration date: —
Examiner: VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHICK VISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Roth, Eli
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by Roth, Eli

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leslie K. Mitchell

Aimee Nassau Gardiner Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto30 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10112UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
009	DVDs featuring movies wherein the DVDs contain alternate versions of movies edited to remove or blur out certain scenes.	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jan 23, 2009	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Jan 23, 2009	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Dec 4, 2008	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Jan 23, 2008	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Jan 17, 2007	RECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED	—
Jan 17, 2007	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Jan 9, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jan 8, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 8, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2007	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Jul 18, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 18, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 2006	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jun 22, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 22, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Dec 19, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2005	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Oct 27, 2005	ATRQ	ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED	—
Oct 19, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 19, 2005	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2005	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Oct 19, 2005	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Apr 22, 2005	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 22, 2005	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 15, 2005	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Mar 24, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 24, 2005	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2004	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2004	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2004	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Mar 24, 2004	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—