USPTO serial 76580411
NETGATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 24, 2006
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with NETGATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AUSTIN, TX, US
Kailua, HI, US
Kailua, HI, US
Kailua, HI, US
Austin, TX, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware, namely, computer chips and modules for wireless communications, data communications, and voice communications; computer software for controlling, operating, and interfacing with wireless communications systems; computer hardware and software enabling wireless access to a computer-based information network; computer network security software for protecting networks from unauthorized access | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RUBICON COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Thompson, Jim
- Other trademarks owned by Thompson, Jim
- Other trademarks owned by Thompson, Jim
- Other trademarks owned by RUBICON COMMUNICATIONS, LP
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named NETGATE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 11, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 11, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 24, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 23, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2004 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |