Drawing for URU

USPTO serial 76581954

URU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MCCRAY, RENEE
Law office
PHOTOCOMP COORDINATOR

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with URU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael G. Burnett

MICHAEL G BURNETT SUITER W PC LLO14301 FNB PKWY STE 220OMAHA, NE 68154-5299UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009encoded electronic chips cards containing programming used to digitally store and read personal dataABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2005ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
May 18, 2005LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED
May 18, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
May 2, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Apr 19, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 11, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 11, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 12, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 5, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 6, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance