Drawing for CYBERNIZER

USPTO serial 76582466

CYBERNIZER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CYBERNIZER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard S. Roberts

RICHARD S ROBERTS ROBERTS & ROBERTS LLP, ATTORNEYS AT LAWPO BOX 484PRINCETON, NJ 08542-0484UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Hand held electronic instruments, namely, personal information manager organizers, keyboards, stili and docking cradles for personal information manager organizers, calculators, spelling checkers, telephone dialers, infrared messaging beam projectors, personal digital assistants, spellers, thesauruses, dictionaries, language translators, metric converters, rulers, schedulers, pagers, radios, headphones, telephones, and computer software for transferring data between a personal computer and a personal information manager organizerACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 15, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 12, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 12, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Mar 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 8, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 24, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 7, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 6, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 30, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 30, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance