CopyMark Law Group
4.9
Drawing for GREENSET THE BEST SURFACE, FOR THE BEST TENNIS

USPTO serial 76582554

GREENSET THE BEST SURFACE, FOR THE BEST TENNIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREENSET THE BEST SURFACE, FOR THE BEST TENNIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, shoes, socks, pants, undershirts, t-shirts, caps, track suits, head and wrist sweatbandsACTIVE—
028Tennis, badminton, squash and lacrosse racquets; nets and netballs for ball gamesACTIVE—
035Business organization and management consulting services; data processing services in a host computer; payroll preparation; conducting business and market research surveys and clerical servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 28, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 13, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 13, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 29, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Dec 29, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 9, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 11, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 30, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 30, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 30, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 23, 2005PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 21, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 13, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance