Drawing for HEALTHY CLASSROOMS INITIATIVE

USPTO serial 76582615

HEALTHY CLASSROOMS INITIATIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEALTHY CLASSROOMS INITIATIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James P. Hanrath

JAMES P HANRATH MUCH SHELIST FREED DENEBERG191 N WACKER DR STE 1800CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing a web site of information in the field of computerized database managementACTIVE
038Computer services, namely providing multi-user access to online computer databases of a global computer information network featuring information, materials, news, postings, assistance, courses, classes, seminars, topical instructions, demonstrations, and testing and data management in the fields of health, education, sports, recreation, personal relationships, and data managementACTIVE
042Database development services, computerized information bank development services, and computerized knowledge and behavioral database development services; and design of custom on-line evaluation, assessment, testing, and data management servicesACTIVE
044Providing information in the field of healthACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 24, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 17, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 13, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 5, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 5, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 10, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance