Drawing for FASTER SAFER SMARTER

USPTO serial 76582981

FASTER SAFER SMARTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FASTER SAFER SMARTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GEORGE W. LEWIS

GEORGE W LEWIS JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NWTHE JENIFER BLDGWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012AUTOMOTIVE AND MARINE BATTERY CHARGERSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 13, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 3, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 3, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Jul 3, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jul 3, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Feb 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Aug 20, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Aug 20, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Jun 22, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Apr 16, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Apr 16, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Oct 17, 2006CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Oct 16, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED
Aug 31, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 3, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 11, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance