USPTO serial 76584062
INDIGO NATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INDIGO NATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THEODORE R. REMAKLUS
THEODORE R. REMAKLUS WOOD HERRON & EVANS L.L.P.2700 CAREW TOWER441 VINE STREETCINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Personal care products, namely, cosmetics, eye shadow, lip gloss, lipstick, nail polish, face powder, body powder, facial cream, body cream; lotions, soaps, body washes, shower gels; hair shampoo, hair conditioner; and fragrances for personal use, perfumes, colognes | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewelry; wristwatches | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Wallets, purses, handbags, shoulder bags; bags, namely, athletic bags, general purpose bags, book bags, duffel bags, tote bags, travel bags, backpacks, waist packs, and luggage | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Women's, men's and children's wearing apparel, namely, casualwear, loungewear and sportswear, namely, underwear, undershirts, bras, panties, slips, nightgowns, pajamas, boxer shorts, briefs, shell bra tanks; belts; headwear, caps, hats, and scarves; gloves, mittens, neck scarves; footwear, socks, hosiery, shoes, boots, sandals, clogs, sneakers, shirts, t-shirts, rugby shirts, blouses, tops, tunics, neckwear, tank tops, cotton woven shirts, knit shirts, jerseys, polo shirts, halters, halter tops, sweatshirts, hooded sweatshirts, sweaters, hooded sweaters, cardigans, sweater coats, turtleneck sweaters, turtleneck tops, jeans, pants, slacks, capri pants, culottes, skorts, sweat pants, warmup pants, skirts, shorts, rompers, jumpers, dresses; outerwear, namely, coats, jackets, anoraks, ski jackets, reversible coats with coat liners, hooded jackets, parkas, snowboarding pants and jackets, vests, ski wear; and swimwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services, mail order services, phone order services, mail order catalog services, and online retail store services all of the foregoing services featuring clothing and accessories for men, women and children including headwear, footwear, underwear, outerwear, swimwear, casual wear, sportswear, belts, gloves,shirts, blouses, tops, neckwear, halters, sweaters, jackets, coats, jeans, pants, vests, skirts, shorts and dresses, cosmetics, fragrances, perfume, personal care products, luggage, handbags, wallets, purses, shoulder bags, backpacks, waistpacks, school bags, and general purpose bags, jewelry, and wristwatches | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Schottenstein, Joseph A.
- Other trademarks owned by Schottenstein, Joseph A.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named INDIGO NATION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 16, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |