USPTO serial 76584120
NO GOOD FESTIVAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NO GOOD FESTIVAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victor T. Fu
Victor T. Fu Richardson & Patel LLPSuite 50010900 Wilshire Blvd.Los Angeles, CA 90024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of a non-fiction television series featuring entertainment and celebrity news; providing entertainment and non-fiction information on topics related to a television program via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 1, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |