USPTO serial 76584246
SILVER X
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SILVER X?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | KNITTED, WOVEN AND NON-WOVEN FABRICS, E;G;, WOOLEN, POLYESTER, RAMIE, LINEN, NYLON, ACRYLIC, COATED WITH ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE MATERIAL, NAMELY SILVER; TEXTILE FABICS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CLOTHING, SPORTS APPAREL, HOSIERY, INTIMATE APPAREL AND UNDERWEAR MADE FROM YARNS OR FIBERS COATED WITH ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE MATERIAL, NAMELY SILVER, AND FABRICS, E;G;, WOOLEN,POLYESTER, RAMIE, LINEN, NYLON, AND ACRYLIC CONTAINING FINELY CHOPPED OR GROUND FIBERS, INCLUDING STAPLE, COATED WITH ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE MATERIAL, NAMELY SILVER | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | APPAREL, SPORTS CLOTHING, T-SHIRTS, SPORTS BRAS, SHORTS, PANTS, SOCKS, INSOLES, UNDERWEAR, HOSIERY, INTIMATE APPAREL, COATED WITH ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE MATERIAL, NAMELY SILVER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |