Drawing for POWERBACKUP

USPTO serial 76584348

POWERBACKUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWERBACKUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Morton J. Rosenberg

MORTON J ROSENBERG ROSENBERG, KLEIN & LEE3458 ELLICOTT CTR DR STE 101ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND FIRMWARE PROGRAMS FOR BACKING UP DATA ON A COMPUTERACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 10, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 10, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 10, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 16, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Dec 16, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 1, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 1, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 23, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 23, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance