USPTO serial 76584855
SOFAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOFAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Yorba Linda, CA
Yorba Linda, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID G. DUCKWORTH
DAVID G DUCKWORTH DRUMMOND & DUCKWORTH9090 IRVINE CENTER DRIVEIRVINE, CA 92618UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely conducting seminars and workshops in the field of asset and business management and business re-engineering | ACTIVE | Jun 20, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |