Drawing for LIL' DADDY

USPTO serial 76585932

LIL' DADDY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIL' DADDY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberta Jacobs-Meadway

ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL1735 MARKET ST 51ST FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7599UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, namely, t-shirts, jackets, pants, shorts, shirts, coats, sweatshirts, belts, ties, gloves, socks, hosiery, underwear, boxer shorts; footwear and headwearACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 24, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 17, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 13, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 4, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 1, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 27, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance