USPTO serial 76586814
DIFFUSIO2N
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIFFUSIO2N?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Duane M. Byers
Duane M. Byers Nixon & Vanderhye, P.C.901 N. Glebe Road, Suite 1100Arlington, VA 22203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceuticals, namely, drugs that increase tissue oxygenation and drugs that assist with cancer treatment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 1, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |