Drawing for EPCCONFIGURATOR

USPTO serial 76587886

EPCCONFIGURATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPCCONFIGURATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SOFTWARE FOR IDENTIFYING AND MATCHING FOR COMPATIBILITY SENSORS, READERS, ANTENNAE, SOFTWARE AND NETWORKS USED IN RADIO FREQUENCY NETWORKING SOLUTIONSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 6, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 6, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 22, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Dec 20, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Dec 19, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Oct 20, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Aug 21, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 18, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Feb 15, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 27, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 11, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance