USPTO serial 76588950
Serial No. 76588950
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3600693Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 7, 2009
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 76588950?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dunfermline, Fife KY11 8GR, GB
Dunfermline, Fife KY11 8GR, GB
Dunfermline, Fife KY11 8GR, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORM D. ST. LANDAU
NORM D ST LANDAU DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPSTE 11001500 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR IMAGE PROCESSING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR IMAGE PROCESSING; RETINAL IMAGE VIEWING SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED FOR IMAGE PROCESSING, FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, DIAGNOSIS AND OPTOMETRY; COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS USED IN THE FIELD OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, DIAGNOSIS AND OPTOMETRY COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER FIRMWARE USED TO MANAGE, MANIPULATE AND FACILITATE THE REVIEW OF DIGITAL IMAGES FOR USE IN THE FIELD OPHTHALMOLOGY, DIAGNOSIS AND OPTOMETRY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | OPHTHALMOSCOPES, OPTICAL DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR THE VISUALIZATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF THE RETINA AND FOR THE VISUALIZATION OF THE RETINA FOR DETECTION AND MANAGEMENT OF EYE DISEASE, NAMELY, SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPES; DIAGNOSTIC OPHTHALMIC APPARATUS FOR THE VISUALIZATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF THE RETINA AND FOR THE VISUALIZATION OF THE RETINA FOR DETECTION AND MANAGEMENT OF EYE DISEASE, NAMELY, SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPES; PARTS AND FITTINGS SOLD THEREWITH | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Provision of optical support services, namely, providing technical consulting services supporting the use of optical apparatus; ophthalmic support services, namely, providing technical consulting services supporting use of ophthalmoscopes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 20, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 18, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 13, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |