Drawing for CAFÉ SWIRL

USPTO serial 76589248

CAFÉ SWIRL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TIERNEY, MARGERY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAFÉ SWIRL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karin E. Peterka

KARIN E PETERKA BUCHALTER NEMER1000 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1000LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-2457UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Publication in the nature of newsletters featuring news and information about wine and the wine industry, distributed by subscription or through select retailers of wine, wine-related products, or epicurean goodsACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, shirts, T-shirts, sweatshirts, pants, shorts, jeans, jackets, dresses, leggings, sweatpants, swimwear, coats, socks, gloves; headwear, namely, hats and caps; and footwear, namely, sandals, shoes and bootsACTIVE—
041Entertainment services in the nature of an on-going entertainment, news and information show or short subject segments on the subject of wine and/or the wine industry, rendered through television, radio or the internetACTIVE—
043Restaurant and cafe servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 18, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 19, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 31, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 26, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 24, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 22, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 22, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 21, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 22, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance