Drawing for AV

USPTO serial 76589351

AV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John H. Weber

JOHN H WEBER BAKER HOSTETLER LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 1100WASHINGTON SQWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5304

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038television broadcasting; video broadcasting; television transmission services; television broadcasting via web cast and satellite transmission; electronic, electric, and digital transmission of voice, data, images, signals, and messages; cable casting services; providing facilities and equipment for video conferencing; providing telephone and video conferencing services; telecommunications consultationACTIVEDec 12, 1984
040close captioning of films and videos; media duplication of data and digital information; and duplication of video tapes, DVDs, CD-ROMs and filmsACTIVEDec 12, 1984
041creating, developing and producing television programs and series; cinema studios; recording studios; production of radio and television programs; film distribution, television and videotape production; and entertainment services in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of specials, comedy, documentary, drama and newsACTIVEDec 1, 2000
042computer services, namely, designing and implementing websites for otherACTIVEApr 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 26, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 13, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 7, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 1, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance