USPTO serial 76589479
POSITIVE FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POSITIVE FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie K.Mitchell
Leslie K.Mitchell ARENT FOX LLP1675 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Candied fruit snacks; cheese and cracker combinations; chocolate milk; chocolate nut butter; dairy-based beverages; dairy-based chocolate food beverages; dairy-based food beverages; fruit leathers; fruit peels; fruit-based snack food, milk; milk-based beverage containing coffee; peanut butter; pork rinds; potato chips; potato crisps; processed apples; processed edible seeds; processed potatoes; raisins; sliced fruits, fresh, canned and bottled; snack dips excluding salsa and other sauces used as dips; snack food dips excluding salsa and other sauces used as dips; snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; soy chips; soy-based food beverage used as milk substitute; soy-based snack foods; whey-based food beverage flavored; whipped topping, dairy and nondairy based; whipping cream; yogurt; yogurt-based beverages | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Bagels; bakery desserts; bakery goods; bakery products; bonbons; bread sticks; breakfast cereals; brioches; brownies; bubble gum; candy bars; candy coated popcorn; candy mints; cappucino; caramel popcorn; cereal based snack food; cheese flavored puffed corn snacks; cheese flavored snacks, namely, cheese curls; cheese flavored snacks, namely cheese balls; chewing gum; chocolate; chocolate chips; chocolate covered nuts; chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable-based; chocolate mousse; chocolate syrup; chocolate topping; chocolate truffles; chocolate-based ready-to-eat food bars; cocoa-based ingredient in confectionery products; coffee-based beverage containing milk; confectionery chips of baking; cookies; corn chips; corn curls; corn flakes; crackers; flavored and sweetened gelatins; flour-based chips; frozen confections; frozen custards; frozen yogurt; glazed popcorn; grain-based beverages; grain-based chips; grain-based food beverages; granola; granola-based snack bars; hot chocolate; ice cream drinks; ice cream substitute; ice milk; licorice; marshmallow topping; marshmallows; microwave popcorn; milk shakes; muesli; nachos; non-medicated lozenges; oatmeal; pancakes; peanut brittle; pretzels; processed cereals; processed corn; processed oats; processed popcorn; processed wheat; puffed corn snacks; ready-to-eat, cereal derived food bars; rice cakes; rice-based snack foods; shakes; sherbet; taco chips; tarts; toasted corn kernels; wafers; waffles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2009 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 22, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |