USPTO serial 76589814
DOUBLE HORSES BRAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 3, 2007
- Examiner
- LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with DOUBLE HORSES BRAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,446*
Plus Government fees of $2,600
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Danton K. Mak
Danton K. Mak Leech Tishman Fuscaldo & Lampl633 W. Fifth Street48th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90071Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Bamboo Boxes for Storage, Bamboo Storage Boxes in the Nature of furniture, Decorative Bamboo Boxes for Knickknacks, Plastic Sink Mats, Plastic Sleeping Mats | ACTIVE | May 31, 2005 |
| 021 | Tooth Picks, Bamboo Recipe Boxes, Bamboo Baskets, Plastic Drip Mats for Tea, Chopsticks, Cooking Skewers | ACTIVE | May 31, 2005 |
| 029 | Processed foods, namely Dried Seafood; Frozen Seafood; Canned seafood; Preserved, Dried, Canned, Cooked and Pickled Fruits, Vegetables, Roots, Nuts, and Flowers for human consumption; Artificially Flavored Meat and seafood broths and extracts; Broths and soups; Artificially Flavored Vegetable Extracts for Soup; Artificially Flavored Vegetable broths; Vegetable Flavored Broths; Canned Coconut Milk; Canned Quail Eggs; Frozen Fruits and Vegetables; Processed Edible Seeds, Nuts, Beans and Flower Buds; Processed Agricultural White Beans, Water Chestnuts, Red Mung Beans, Mung Beans, Red Kidney Beans, Black Beans, Red Beans, Pearl Barleys, Small Red Beans, Processed Bean Curds; Tamarind Soup Mix, Vietnam Sour Soup Paste, Curry Soup Paste, Chili in Oil, Fruit Based Snack Food in the Nature of Flavored Gel Snacks; Fruit Based Jelly Snack Foods; Soy Milk; Dried Foods in Powder Form, Namely, Coconut Cream Powder in the Nature of Pulverized Dried Coconut | ACTIVE | May 31, 2005 |
| 030 | Staple foods namely, Dried Chili peppers; Spices, Pastes and Mixes Used For Seasoning Namely, Curry Paste, Thai Sweet Noodle Seasoning Paste, Crab Seasoning Paste, Tamarind Seasoning Paste, Beef Flavoring Paste, Instant Hot and Sour Seasoning Paste, Chili Seasoning Paste, Laab Nam Tok Seasoning Mix, Toddy Palm Seasoning Paste, Red Bean Paste, Pepper, Curry Powder, Shrimp Seasoning Powder; Tapioca products namely, Tapioca, Tapioca Starch, Tapioca Flour, Tapioca Pearl; Flours Used for Baking, for Frying, for Thickening, for Seasoning, for Sauces and for Soups, namely, Rice Flour, Sweet Rice Flour, and Tempura Flour; Dried Foods in Powder Form for Use as Seasonings, namely, Rice and grains namely, Jasmine Rice, Sweet Rice, White Broken Rice, Black Rice, Frozen Sticky Rice, Sweet Black Rice and White Rice; Spring Roll wrappers; Sauces and condiments namely, Fish Sauce, Soy Sauce, Spring Roll Sauce, Sweet Soy Sauce, Black Soy Sauce, Thin Soy Sauce, Pad Thai Sauce, Sweet Chili Sauce, Sriracha Hot Sauce, Sukiyaki Sauce, Chili Sauce with soya bean oil, Spicy Thai Salad Dressing, Fresh Chili Sauce, Mud Fish Sauce, Light Soy Sauce, Seasoning Sauce, Oyster Sauce, Ground Bean Sauce, Chilli Sauce, Bean Sauce, Sweet Black Vinegar, Shrimp Sauce and Sugar and confectioneries namely, Palm Sugar, Tamarind Candy, Cookies, candies, Ice Cream and sherbets, Fruit Flavored Puddings; Flavored gelatin snacks consisting primarily of sweetened gelatin; Crackers; Teas; teas namely, Asian Tea, Green Tea, Thai Tea Drink, Lemon Tea Drink, Winter Melon Tea and Thai Tea with Basil Seed Drink; Edible Flour Based Snack Chips Namely, Crab Flavored Chips and Shrimp Flavored Chips; Noodles and Pasta; Noodles and Pasta namely, Noodles, Bean Threads, Egg Noodles, Rice Noodles, Instant Noodles, Vermicelli, Rice Sticks, Flour Sticks, Edible Rice Paper, Artificially Flavored Vegetable Extracts used as Flavoring; Instant Coffee Mix; Thai Tea Mix; Coffee Beverages; Coffee Beverages, namely, Coffee Drink, Ice Mocha Coffee, Vietnam Coffee, Iced Milk Coffee, Ice Cappuccino Coffee | ACTIVE | May 31, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by J & A IMPORTERS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by J & A IMPORTERS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by J & A IMPORTERS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named DOUBLE HORSES BRAND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 3, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 3, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 24, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 31, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 16, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |