USPTO serial 76589991
REMIT21
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITE, RICHARD F
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REMIT21?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hoffman Estates, IL
Hoffman Estates, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Strand
Peter J. Strand HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP131 S. Dearborn St.30th FloorCHICAGO, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and computer software for use in document imaging, image storage and retrieval, remittance processing, payment processing, check processing and electronic funds/payment transaction processing, and printed user manuals sold as a unit therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Check and electronic payment clearing, settlement, forwarding, aggregation, archival, retrieval and payment services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming for others; computer consulting services; computer equipment leasing; computer systems project management; computer network design for others; and integration of computer systems and networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tangent Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Tangent Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named REMIT21
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 20, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 25, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |