Drawing for GOLDEN GLOVE

USPTO serial 76590093

GOLDEN GLOVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOLDEN GLOVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Amer

MYRON AMER ESQ114 OLD COUNTRY RD STE 310MINEOLA, NY 11501-4410UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Baseball gloves for Little League baseball playersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 29, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 13, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 28, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 23, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 23, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Oct 26, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 25, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Oct 21, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 20, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 29, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 19, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 2, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 2, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance