USPTO serial 76590170
MDDEV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3261516Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 10, 2007
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MDDEV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Medical Digital Developers, LLC
New York, NY
Medical Digital Developers, LLC
New York, NY
Medical Digital Developers, LLC
Brooklyn, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melise R. Blakeslee
MELISE R BLAKESLEE MCDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY600 13TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3096UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer systems, comprised of hardware and software used for managing digital or video records, associated sound, text-based and meeting records, specifically including database management software, computer software applications for managing digital or video records, and software applications for voice recognition, and databases in the fields of medicine, prescriptions, medical records, digital media, voice recognition, and data capture recorded on computer media; custom computer peripherals, namely computer hardware, computer keyboard, digital camera, computer microphone and computer mouse | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 19, 2006 |
| 042 | Technology consulting for medical practices; technology consulting, research, design and development for others, namely, software and computer system development, multimedia development and software design services in the fields of media and medical technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Medical Digital Developers, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Medical Digital Developers, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Medical Digital Developers, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MDDEV
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 21, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |