USPTO serial 76590254
SILVER ARMOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3462780Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 8, 2008
- Examiner
- LOWRY, LEIGH A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SILVER ARMOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SCRANTON, PA
SCRANTON, PA
NOBLE FIBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CLARKS SUMMIT, PA
NOBLE FIBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CLARKS SUMMIT, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore M Green
Robert W. Hayes Cozen O'Connor1900 Market StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Knitted, woven and non-woven fabrics coated with electrically conductive material, namely, silver; textile fabrics made from yarns or fibers coated with electrically conductive material, namely, silver, and from finely chopped or ground fibers coated with electrically conductive material, namely, silver; linen lining fabric for shoes; textile fabrics for the manufacture of clothing | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2006 |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, bathing suits, infant cloth diapers, gloves, hats, insoles, uniforms, shoes, socks, pantyhose, underwear, driving gloves, jerseys, t-shirts and waistbands | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NOBLE FIBER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NOBLE FIBER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NOBLE FIBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NOBLE FIBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SILVER ARMOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2009 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | SSFR | SU - SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | SSFR | SU - SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | SSFR | SOU - SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 2, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |