USPTO serial 76590626
STREAMLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3190249Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 26, 2006
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with STREAMLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. G. Gordon Martin
C. G. Gordon Martin THE LAW OFFICES OF C. G. GORDON MARTIN99 South Lake AvenueSuite 501Pasadena, CA 91101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for accessing a web site for use by real estate agents and brokers in providing professional services to their clients in connection with real estate mortgage loans | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |