USPTO serial 76590759
COOLWHISPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COOLWHISPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-92676 Eschenbach, DE
D-92676 Eschenbach, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart L. Gitler
STEWART L GITLER HOFFMAN, WASSON & GITLER PC2461 S CLARK ST STE 522CRYSTAL CTR 2ARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic integrated and printed circuits for cooling of electrical and electronic apparatus including computers; modules for cooling of electrical and electronic apparatus including computers, namely, computer heat sinks, heat skinks for use in CPUs, computer hard drives and computer power supplies, and heat sinks for use in electronic components; heat exchangers for central processing units and graphic chips; cooling systems comprised of liquid to air heat exchangers for use in cooling computers and CPUs, computer hard drives and computer power supplies | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Modules for cooling of electrical and electronic apparatus, namely, heat sinks for use in heating, cooling, and ventilating apparatus; cooling systems comprised of liquid to air heat exchangers for use in cooling electrical and electronic apparatus, not being parts of machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CURAMIK ELECTRONICS GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by CURAMIK ELECTRONICS GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named COOLWHISPER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | PBIR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |