USPTO serial 76591004
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Edmonton, Alberta T6H 5R7, CA
Edmonton, Alberta T6H 5R7, CA
EA INTERNATIONAL (STUDIO AND PUBLISHING) LTD.
HAMILTON, BM
Other trademarks owned by EA INTERNATIONAL (STUDIO AND PUBLISHING) LTD.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jacob J. Schatz
Jacob J. Schatz Electronic Arts Inc.209 Redwood Shores ParkwayLegal Dept.Redwood City, CA 94065| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game software; prerecorded films, video tapes and video discs containing movies and television shows featuring characters from a computer game; prerecorded audio tapes, videotapes and video and audio discs featuring characters, voices and soundtrack from a computer game | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Paper goods, namely, computer game instruction manuals, comic books, strategy guides for playing computer games, trading cards, pogs, coloring books, adhesive stickers, rub-on transfers, notebooks and stationery-type portfolios | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys and games, namely, action figures and action figures accessories | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, production of television shows and motion pictures based on a computer game | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 23, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 4, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |