Drawing for DRAGON AGE

USPTO serial 76591004

DRAGON AGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DRAGON AGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jacob J. Schatz

Jacob J. Schatz Electronic Arts Inc.209 Redwood Shores ParkwayLegal Dept.Redwood City, CA 94065

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game software; prerecorded films, video tapes and video discs containing movies and television shows featuring characters from a computer game; prerecorded audio tapes, videotapes and video and audio discs featuring characters, voices and soundtrack from a computer gameACTIVE—
016Paper goods, namely, computer game instruction manuals, comic books, strategy guides for playing computer games, trading cards, pogs, coloring books, adhesive stickers, rub-on transfers, notebooks and stationery-type portfoliosACTIVE—
028Toys and games, namely, action figures and action figures accessoriesACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, production of television shows and motion pictures based on a computer gameACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 16, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 16, 2008WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
May 16, 2008WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
May 14, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 9, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 26, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 26, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 12, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 12, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 23, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 23, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 7, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 7, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 16, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 16, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 4, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 16, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 16, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 18, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 26, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 6, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 6, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 24, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance