Drawing for AMPLINK

USPTO serial 76591082

AMPLINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AMPLINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David B. Murphy

POLAPHAT VERAVANICH O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP610 NEWPORT CTR DR 17TH FLNEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-6429UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electronic devices, namely, font-end filters, amplifiers, duplexers, multiplexers, power amplifiers, and high-temperature superconductors, for use in wireless communications networks and wireless infiastructure equipmentABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 21, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 21, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Nov 16, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 2, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 16, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 5, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 5, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 13, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 13, 2004CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 13, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 6, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance