USPTO serial 76591219
PERFECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 14, 2006
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with PERFECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INTERNATIONAL B.V.
ARNHEM, NL
Other trademarks owned by AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INTERNATIONAL B.V.
AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INTERNATIONAL B.V.
ARNHEM, NL
Other trademarks owned by AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INTERNATIONAL B.V.
AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INTERNATIONAL B.V.
Amsterdam, NL
Other trademarks owned by AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INTERNATIONAL B.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul Cosmovici
244 Fifth Avenue, 2nd Floor # suite-1279New York, NY 10001United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Finishing paints, varnishes and lacquers for marine vessels | ACTIVE | Dec 10, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INTERNATIONAL B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INTERNATIONAL B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INTERNATIONAL B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named PERFECTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2026 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2026 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 21, 2026 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 21, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 23, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 23, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |