Drawing for THEATL

USPTO serial 76591278

THEATL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IM, JEAN H
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THEATL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mitchell H. Stabbe

MITCHELL H STABBE DOW, LOHNES & ALBERTSON PLLC1200 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed matter, namely, magazines, a weekly newspaper and a section of a newspaper in the fields of general and local, national and international news, directory type listings of businesses and organizations, shopping, retail sales, movies, theater, television and radio programs, sporting events, concerts, museums, exhibitions and festivals, and sights and attractions of interest to residents of and tourists and visitors to Atlanta, GeorgiaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 28, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 28, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 28, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 12, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 2, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 1, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 8, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 28, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 17, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 16, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 26, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 26, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance