USPTO serial 76591278
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell H. Stabbe
MITCHELL H STABBE DOW, LOHNES & ALBERTSON PLLC1200 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, magazines, a weekly newspaper and a section of a newspaper in the fields of general and local, national and international news, directory type listings of businesses and organizations, shopping, retail sales, movies, theater, television and radio programs, sporting events, concerts, museums, exhibitions and festivals, and sights and attractions of interest to residents of and tourists and visitors to Atlanta, Georgia | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |