USPTO serial 76591529
DALLAS! THE TEXAS STAR DALLAS CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- โ
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DALLAS! THE TEXAS STAR DALLAS CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan N. Greenspan
Alan N. Greenspan JACKSON WALKER L.L.P.901 MAIN STREET, SUITE 6000DALLAS, TX 75202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and business services, namely, promoting business, conventions and tourism in the City of Dallas, Texas | ACTIVE | โ |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE DALLAS CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU
- Other trademarks owned by THE DALLAS CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named DALLAS! THE TEXAS STAR DALLAS CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 9, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | โ |
| Aug 8, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | โ |
| Jan 11, 2008 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | โ |
| Jan 9, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | โ |
| Dec 20, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Dec 5, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | โ |
| Dec 5, 2007 | RGEX | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | โ |
| Dec 5, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | โ |
| Dec 5, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | โ |
| Dec 5, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | โ |
| Dec 1, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | โ |
| Jun 6, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | โ |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | โ |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | โ |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | โ |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | โ |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | โ |
| May 5, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| May 5, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Apr 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | โ |
| Apr 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | โ |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| May 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |