Drawing for PURE DIGITAL CINEMA

USPTO serial 76591998

PURE DIGITAL CINEMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3033569Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 27, 2005
Examiner
FINE, STEVEN
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PURE DIGITAL CINEMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Troy M. Schmelzer

BARRY F SOALT PROCOPIO CORY HARGREAVES & SAVITCH LLP530 B ST STE 2100SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041movie theater services featuring the exhibition of movies, music events, sports events, and previously and/or real-time televised eventsSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDMay 8, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2009C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL
Mar 12, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 16, 2009C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED
Jan 16, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Dec 27, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 6, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 6, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 6, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 11, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 25, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance