Drawing for THE BLACK WALL STREET

USPTO serial 76592202

THE BLACK WALL STREET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERKINS, ELLEN J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE BLACK WALL STREET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott J. Major

Scott J. Major MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN, PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201-3360UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Musical sound recordingsACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, sweatshirts, t-shirts, jackets and hats, all relating to a recording label; for sale at concert venues and via the recording label's websiteACTIVE—
035Promoting the goods and services of others, namely promoting the musical events, concerts, and sound and video recordings of others; promotion of musical performing artists; distributorships featuring sound and/or visual recordingsACTIVE—
041Providing recording label services, namely audio and video recording and production of sound and/or visual recordings; and providing prerecorded music and audiovisual materials, photographs and articles, commentary and information, all in the field of music, via a websiteACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 3, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 4, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 14, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 5, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 4, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 4, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 4, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 4, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 11, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 15, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 12, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 23, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 30, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 23, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 18, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 17, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 6, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance