CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for TORQMASTER

USPTO serial 76592465

TORQMASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TORQMASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Simor Moskowitz

Simor Moskowitz Jacobson Holman PLLC400 Seventh Street, N.W.Suite 600Washington, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006THREADED METAL DRILL PIPE CONNECTIONS USED ON METAL DRILL PIPE FOR THE DRILLING OF OIL AND GAS WELLS AND OTHER EARTH BOREHOLESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 1, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 1, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 1, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 4, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 24, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 24, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 24, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 24, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 2, 2008CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Dec 17, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2007INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Nov 16, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 8, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 8, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 25, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 25, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 28, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 8, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 8, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 16, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 16, 2006PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Oct 2, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 11, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 8, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 16, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 27, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 8, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance