USPTO serial 76592736
QUIET TUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUIET TUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Material Sciences Corporation, Engineered Materials and Solutions Group, Inc.
Elk Grove Village, IL
Material Sciences Corporation, Engineered Materials and Solutions Group, Inc.
Elk Grove Village, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harold V. Stotland
HAROLD V STOTLAND SEYFARTH SHAW LLP131 S DEARBORN ST STE 2400CHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | material in the form of a sandwich consisting of outer metal sheets and a non-metal sheet between them, which material is sold to customers who fabricate it into noise-reduction products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Material Sciences Corporation, Engineered Materials and Solutions Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Material Sciences Corporation, Engineered Materials and Solutions Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Similar marks named QUIET TUBE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 31, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |